ArticleBMC psychology2026
Exploring institutional factors of resilience in undergraduate medical training: a thematic inquiry into experiences of medical students.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResilience is an essential attribute for medical students to manage academic demands and sustain well-being during training. While resilience has traditionally been studied at the individual level, less attention has been given to institutional factors that shape its development.
objectiveThis study explored the institutional factors contributing to resilience among undergraduate medical students.
methodsA qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 55 participants, including 45 medical students and 10 faculty and administrative staff. Data were collected through four focus group discussions and individual interviews, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsSix themes were identified: learning environment, support systems, extracurricular activities, academics, financial barriers, and faculty role. Findings indicated that supportive institutional environments enhanced resilience, while academic pressure and financial constraints undermined students' well-being.
conclusionsInstitutional factors play a central role in shaping medical students' resilience. Strengthening supportive learning environments and institutional support systems may enhance student well-being and academic success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.