Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42786490›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2026

DockM8: an all-in-one open-source platform for consensus virtual screening in drug design.

Antoine Lacour, Hamza Agha, Anna K H Hirsch, Andrea Volkamer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Information leakage in enzyme-substrate prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antoine LacourHelmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), Campus E8.1, 66123, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.
Hamza AghaData Driven Drug Design, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Saarland University, Campus E2.1, 66123, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.
Anna K H HirschHelmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), Campus E8.1, 66123, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany.
Andrea VolkamerHelmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), Campus E8.1, 66123, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany. andrea.volkamer@uni-saarland.de.

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 860816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual screening remains a critical step in structure-based drug design, yet variability in docking algorithms and scoring functions often limits its reliability. To address this challenge, we introduce DockM8, an open-source platform for consensus virtual screening that integrates pocket detection, ligand preparation, docking, rescoring, and consensus ranking within a single modular workflow. DockM8 supports five docking engines, 17 pose-selection methods, 17 scoring functions (SFs), and five consensus methods, all accessible through both a graphical user interface (GUI) and a Python application programming interface (API). Systematic evaluation on the DEKOIS 2.0, DUD-E, and Lit-PCBA datasets yielded median relative enrichments of 100%, 82.59%, and 8.85%, respectively, frequently matching or outperforming state-of-the-art approaches. Our findings further reveal that no pose-selection or consensus strategy universally excels, emphasizing the need for tailored, target-specific workflows. DockM8 is freely available under the GNU General Public License at https://github.com/DrugBud-Suite/DockM8 . Scientific contributionDockM8 is, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive open-source platform to integrate the complete consensus structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) pipeline within a single, graphical-interface-driven tool, yielding over 55 million configurable protocols, a breadth unmatched by previously published consensus docking software. Through systematic multi-benchmark evaluation, we demonstrate that no single pose-selection or consensus strategy generalizes across targets, motivating a target-specific workflow-selection paradigm in place of prevailing one-size-fits-all heuristics. By delivering this tunability through a graphical interface rather than scripts, DockM8 brings rigorous, reproducible consensus virtual screening within reach of non-specialist medicinal chemists.

Indexed as

ConsensusDockingOpen-sourceVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID42786490
PMCPMC13613745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.