ArticleBMC neurology2026
Exploring work stressors and resources and their perceived effects on symptoms and work ability in employees with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdverse working conditions can lead to reduced working hours, career changes, or early exit from the workforce among employees with multiple sclerosis. The aim of the present study was to explore work-related stressors and resources, as well as their effects on symptoms and work ability, as perceived by employees with multiple sclerosis in Germany.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted via video conference and telephone. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using MAXQDA and qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz.
resultsOf the 26 participants (73.1% women, mean age 38.4 years, SD = 10.2), 73.1% worked full-time and 26.9% part-time (> 19 h) across various sectors, including, e.g., public services, healthcare, IT, trade and industry, and crafts. Stressors and resources were categorized into three groups: (1) work-related factors (work contents and demands, work organization, and workplace conditions), (2) social factors (relationship with supervisors and colleagues), and (3) person-related factors (self-expectations, attitudes towards work and handling of the disease). Reported work stressors contributed to symptoms, such as fatigue, sensory disturbances, and cognitive and visual impairments, which impacted work ability. Reported work resources enhanced cognition and fine motor skills, distracted participants from focusing on their disease, and fostered motivation and energy to carry out their profession.
conclusionsThe results provide insights into which factors are essential for improving well-being and work ability in employees with multiple sclerosis. Based on these findings, workplace interventions and adaptations can be considered to enable employees with multiple sclerosis to remain in the workforce for a longer time. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.