ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Clinical outcomes of preoperative skull traction combined with intraoperative two-step reduction and occipitocervical fusion for type a basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a staged reduction strategy combining preoperative skull traction with intraoperative two-step reduction and occipitocervical fusion in patients with type A basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation (BI-AAD).
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 27 patients with reducible type A BI-AAD who underwent posterior occipitocervical fusion with foramen magnum decompression between January 2019 and April 2025. All patients received preoperative skull traction followed by a staged two-step reduction strategy. Radiological parameters, including the atlantodental interval (ADI), the distance from the odontoid process to the Chamberlain line (DOCL), and the cervicomedullary angle (CMA), were evaluated preoperatively and at postoperative follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and visual analogue scale (VAS). Fusion status and perioperative complications were also recorded.
resultsAll patients successfully underwent surgery. The mean operative time was 122.63 ± 17.59 min, and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 237.04 ± 89.43 mL. The mean follow-up duration was 19.93 ± 7.27 months. Significant improvements in radiological parameters were observed at the final follow-up, with ADI decreasing from 10.60 ± 0.94 mm to 1.20 ± 0.11 mm, DOCL from 11.70 ± 2.14 mm to 2.67 ± 0.27 mm, and CMA increasing from 116.96 ± 10.54° to 143.84 ± 2.69° (P < 0.05). Clinical outcomes also improved significantly, with the JOA score increasing from 8.56 ± 1.01 to 15.04 ± 0.71 and the VAS score decreasing from 6.59 ± 0.89 to 1.48 ± 0.51. Solid bone fusion was achieved in all patients. Two perioperative complications occurred (one dural tear and one wound infection), both of which resolved after appropriate treatment.
conclusionThe staged reduction strategy combining preoperative skull traction with intraoperative two-step reduction and occipitocervical fusion appears to be an effective and safe approach for the treatment of reducible type A BI-AAD. This technique may facilitate a gradual and more controllable reduction process, while achieving satisfactory radiological realignment and clinical improvement. Further prospective and comparative studies are warranted to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.