Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42786454›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2026

Comparative evaluation of irrigant activation devices for removal of calcium hydroxide from artificial isthmuses connecting curved canals in 3D-printed resin molar models.

Gülçin Cagay Sevencan, Sevcan Akça

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gülçin Cagay SevencanDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Tekirdag, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8486-4572
Sevcan AkçaDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sakarya University, Sakarya, 54100, Turkey. sevcanakca@sakarya.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0002-7544-5325

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCalcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂), confirmed effective in studies, is frequently used as an interappointment medicament in root canal treatment. The challenges related to removing this medication from the root canals before the filling negatively influence post-treatment success. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of different irrigant activation devices-sonic activation (EDDY), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), and shockwave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS)-in removing Ca(OH)₂ from artificial isthmuses connecting curved root canals in 3D-printed resin molar models.

methodsSeventy resin-based upper molar models with two curved canals connected by three standardized isthmuses were 3D-printed (Hex 600, Edudent, Türkiye). After canal preparation and Ca(OH)₂ (Well-Paste, Korea) placement, samples were randomly assigned to five groups (control group n = 10, experimental group n = 15) for Ca(OH)₂ removal: conventional needle irrigation (control) (NaviTip, Ultradent, USA), EDDY sonic irrigation (VDW, Germany), PUI (Guilin Woodpecker Medical Instrument Co., LTD, China), PIPS, and SWEEPS (Fotona, Slovenia) laser-assisted irrigation. Irrigation protocols were standardized for volume and duration. The percentage of cleaned isthmus areas was quantified using pre- and post-irrigation imaging under microscopy and analyzed with ImageJ software (NIH, USA). Statistical comparisons were performed using robust ANOVA.

resultsSignificant differences in Ca(OH)₂ removal efficacy were found between groups (p < 0.001). The SWEEPS group showed the highest median cleaning percentage (47.71%), followed by PIPS (37.96%), EDDY (29.30%), PUI (28.22%), and control (11.26%). SWEEPS showed the highest median cleaned isthmus percentage, followed by PIPS, while PUI and EDDY demonstrated comparable values. Conventional needle irrigation showed the lowest cleaning performance. Cleaning efficacy varied significantly among isthmus locations (coronal > middle > apical, p = 0.007). SWEEPS, PIPS, and EDDY showed similarly high cleaning efficacy, with PUI demonstrating comparable performance, while conventional needle irrigation showed significantly lower values. No significant differences were observed between groups in the apical isthmus.

conclusionNone of the irrigation activation techniques achieved complete removal of calcium hydroxide. Cleaning efficacy was significantly influenced by both irrigation method and isthmus location. Laser-activated irrigation systems showed higher efficacy in specific regions, while conventional needle irrigation consistently demonstrated the lowest performance. Overall, irrigation effectiveness in isthmus-containing root canals exhibited a clear anatomy-dependent pattern.

Indexed as

Calcium HydroxideDental Pulp CavityPrinting, Three-DimensionalRoot Canal IrrigantsTherapeutic IrrigationHumansModels, DentalMolarPhotoacoustic TechniquesRoot Canal PreparationCalcium HydroxideRoot Canal IrrigantsCalcium hydroxide removalPassive ultrasonic irrigationShockwave-enhanced Emission Photoacoustic Streaming (SWEEPS)Sonic activationThree - dimensional (3D) printing model

Identifiers

PMID42786454
PMCPMC13602780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.