Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42786383›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2026

Neuromonitoring in the Decompressed Brain: Rethinking Physiology, Monitoring, and Thresholds After Decompressive Craniectomy.

Daniel Agustin Godoy, Wellingson Silva Paiva, Robson Luís Oliveira de Amorim, Maximiliano Rovegno, Andres Mariano Rubiano

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel Agustin GodoyMeditech Foundation, Calle 7A # 44-103, 760036, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia. dagodoytorres@yahoo.com.ar.
Wellingson Silva PaivaDivisão de Neurocirurgia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Robson Luís Oliveira de AmorimHospital Universitário Getúlio Vargas, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Maximiliano RovegnoDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Andres Mariano RubianoMeditech Foundation, Cali, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a life-saving intervention for refractory intracranial hypertension across traumatic, ischemic, and hemorrhagic etiologies. While its immediate hemodynamic benefits are well established, DC fundamentally disrupts intracranial physiology by abolishing the closed-box condition of the cranial vault, thereby altering the interpretation of all monitored parameters. Neuromonitoring (NM) after DC remains a largely unaddressed domain in current consensus statements and evidence-based guidelines. This viewpoint synthesizes available evidence to address five critical clinical questions: the pathophysiological changes induced by DC; the rationale for continued invasive monitoring; the optimal sensor placement site; the contribution of noninvasive monitoring modalities; and whether conventional ICP and CPP thresholds remain applicable in the decompressed brain. Observational data indicate that intracranial hypertension persists or recurs in 36-76% of patients post-DC, underscoring the continued value of monitoring. Emerging evidence challenges the universal applicability of standard ICP thresholds, with post-DC data suggesting clinically relevant outcomes at substantially lower values. These findings highlight a fundamental gap in the field and underscore the urgent need for prospective, standardized research in the decompressed brain.

Indexed as

Cerebral perfusion pressureDecompressive craniectomyIntracranial pressure monitoringMalignant cerebral infarctionNeuromonitoringTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.