ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Beyond faces: The effect of context on ensemble emotion perception.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to judge the overall emotion of a crowd is fundamental to navigating naturalistic social scenes. However, research has typically studied such judgments using isolated faces, without any contextual information. In two experiments, this study investigates how facial expressions, background context, and observers' emotional states jointly influence ensemble emotion perception in naturalistic scenes. In Experiment 1, participants judged the overall emotion of crowd scenes that were constructed by superimposing human figures, whose facial emotional values were quantified on a continuous scale based on naturalistic photographs, onto emotionally positive, negative, or neutral backgrounds. Bayesian model comparisons revealed that both facial emotion and background valence influenced mean judgments, with positive (negative) backgrounds biasing ratings in a more positive (negative) direction. In Experiment 2, we examined how observer mood modulates this integration by inducing positive or negative affect through an autobiographical recall task. Model comparisons revealed that observer mood also influenced judgment, extending the model of Experiment 1. Although observer mood exhibited no reliable main effect on mean ratings, it was found to significantly affect response variability: participants in a positive mood showed reduced variability, which suggests more consistent ensemble judgments. Together, these findings demonstrate that ensemble emotion perception integrates multiple sources of information beyond facial expressions; specifically, both external and internal contexts substantially influence how collective mood is perceived in social scenes. These findings emphasize the importance of studying ensemble perception in naturalistic settings. The trial-level data and analysis codes for all the experiments are available on the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B9GMQ ). None of the experiments were preregistered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42786263What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.