ArticleNature communications2026
The Caenorhabditis elegans microbiome impacts microsporidia infection through nutrient limitation and spore inactivation.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Defense against parasites covaries with reproductive timing, not with resistance.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microsporidia are fungal parasites that can only reproduce inside the cells of a host, and they infect most animal groups, including humans and agriculturally important species. Animals also harbor a microbiome, which can shape resistance to infection, but the mechanisms by which bacteria influence microsporidia infection are poorly understood. To address this, we tested how bacteria associated with the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans affect infection by its natural microsporidian parasite, Nematocida parisii. Here we show that nematodes grown on Chryseobacterium scophthalmum or Sphingobacterium multivorum exhibit increased initial parasite invasion but reduced subsequent growth. Broad profiling of host lipids reveals that these bacteria disrupt levels of unsaturated fatty acids, and adding back one such fatty acid, linoleic acid, restores parasite growth in animals raised on S. multivorum. We also found that Pseudomonas lurida and Pseudomonas mendocina secrete molecules that inactivate N. parisii spores, with P. lurida activity depending on the antimicrobial lipopeptide massetolide. We tested 53 additional Pseudomonas strains, 64% of which significantly reduced N. parisii infection. Our results indicate that bacterial interference with microsporidia is widespread, acting both by reshaping host metabolism and by directly inactivating parasite spores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.