Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42786131›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS2026

Fampridine for Symptomatic Treatment in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study.

Peter Nørregaard Hansen, Lars Markvardsen, Hatice Tankisi, Henning Andersen, Thomas Krøigård, Søren Sindrup

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter Nørregaard HansenDepartment of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2556-0229
Lars MarkvardsenDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5562-9768
Hatice TankisiDepartment of Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8495-9769
Henning AndersenDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thomas KrøigårdDepartment of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1565-6948
Søren SindrupDepartment of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0357-8628

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF 18OC0053006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsChronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated neuropathy that may cause persistent disability despite immunoglobulin treatment. Ion channel dysfunction has been demonstrated in CIDP, but no therapies specifically target this mechanism. We investigated whether fampridine improves clinical function and electrophysiological measures in CIDP patients with residual symptoms.

methodsIn this two-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, patients with CIDP receiving stable subcutaneous or intravenous immunoglobulin were assigned to 4 weeks of fampridine (10 mg twice daily) or placebo, separated by a washout period. Co-primary outcomes were changes in Six-Spot-Step Test (SSST) and Nine-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT). Secondary outcomes included clinical scores, patient-reported outcomes, nerve conduction studies, and nerve excitability testing.

resultsTwenty-eight patients were included in the study. No significant differences were observed between fampridine and placebo for SSST (p = 0.154) or 9-HPT (p = 0.857). Grip strength and R-ODS worsened during fampridine compared with placebo (Bonferroni-adjusted p = 0.007 for both), while other clinical outcomes showed no differences. Median nerve CMAP amplitude with proximal stimulation increased significantly during fampridine treatment (adjusted p = 0.040). No significant changes were observed in other electrophysiological variables, including nerve excitability testing. No serious adverse events occurred and adverse effects were predominantly mild.

interpretationOur study did not provide evidence that fampridine improves clinical function in CIDP patients with residual disability during stable immunoglobulin therapy. Targeting ion channel dysfunction in CIDP remains of interest, but alternative strategies may be required.

Indexed as

4-AminopyridineOutcome Assessment, Health CarePolyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory DemyelinatingPotassium Channel BlockersAdultAgedCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve Conduction StudiesNeural ConductionTreatment Outcome4-AminopyridinePotassium Channel Blockerschronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathyfampridinenerve excitability testingrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID42786131
PMCPMC13612250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.