ArticleBMJ open2026
Effectiveness and psychological mechanism of group-based IMPROVE therapy for treatment seeking college students with problematic internet use in China: study protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomised clinical trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07434778 (Effectiveness and Psychological Mechanisms of Group-based IMPROVE Therapy for Problematic Internet Use in University Students), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness and Psychological Mechanisms of Group-based IMPROVE Therapy for Problematic Internet Use in University Students: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProblematic internet use (PIU) is a prevalent and heterogeneous mental health problem among university students, associated with significant psychological distress and functional impairment. Although various psychosocial interventions have demonstrated efficacy, existing randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are frequently limited by small sample sizes, single-component designs and insufficient investigation of underlying psychological mechanisms. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and psychological mechanisms of IMPROVE (Identify, Monitor, Plan, Real-world activities, Observe emotion, Vulnerability and Emotion regulation), a manualised, multimodal group-based psychotherapy integrating cognitive-behavioural strategies with motivational elements, mindfulness training and socially interactive exercise for the treatment of PIU among university students. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-blind RCT will recruit 600 university students with moderate-to-severe PIU (Internet Addiction Test (IAT) ≥50) from multiple campuses. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to either an 8-week IMPROVE intervention or an enhanced waitlist control condition. The primary outcome is change in PIU severity (IAT score) from baseline to post-intervention. Secondary outcomes include remission rates, internet-related behaviours, craving, functional impairment, comorbid psychopathology and well-being. Candidate psychological mediators-maladaptive cognitions, self-efficacy, emotion regulation, mind wandering, anhedonia, resilience and perceived stress-will be assessed longitudinally to support formal mediation analyses. Prespecified moderation analyses will examine treatment heterogeneity across PIU subtypes and baseline characteristics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (approval no. 2026-0152). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07434778 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07434778).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.