ArticleBMJ open2026
Perceived illness uncertainty and its associated factors among oesophageal cancer patients: a cross-sectional study based on the health ecology model.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBased on the health ecology model, this study investigates the current status of illness uncertainty perception in oesophageal cancer patients scheduled for surgery and analyses its associated factors.
designA cross-sectional study.
settingThe study was conducted in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at a tertiary hospital in Suzhou, China, from May 2024 to December 2025.
participantsA total of 230 oesophageal cancer patients scheduled for surgery were recruited using convenience sampling. All participants were hospitalised in the Department of Thoracic Surgery during the study period and met the inclusion criteria for the research. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was perceived illness uncertainty, measured using the Short Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. Secondary outcomes included state anxiety (assessed by the State Anxiety Inventory), medical coping styles (assessed by the Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire) and perceived social support (assessed by the Perceived Social Support Scale). Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were also collected using a self-designed general information questionnaire.
resultsA total of 230 patients were included. The total score for perceived illness uncertainty was 36.25±5.36. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that receipt of neoadjuvant therapy (β=-0.131, 95% CI -2.524 to -0.965, p<0.001), shorter daily sleep duration (β=-0.074, 95% CI -1.373 to -0.014, p=0.045), high state anxiety (β=0.428, 95% CI 0.222 to 0.357, p<0.001), avoidance coping tendency (β=0.123, 95% CI 0.104 to 0.442, p=0.002) and resignation coping tendency (β=0.120, 95% CI 0.061 to 0.589, p=0.016) and poor social support (β=-0.269, 95% CI -0.245 to -0.115, p<0.001) were the prominent factors associated with patients' perceived illness uncertainty, collectively explaining 82.1% of the total variance.
conclusionsOesophageal cancer patients scheduled for surgery exhibit a high level of perceived illness uncertainty, which is related to multiple correlates across various levels, including personal characteristics, behavioural traits and interpersonal networks. Preoperative receipt of neoadjuvant therapy, shorter daily sleep duration, high anxiety state, avoidance coping tendency, resignation coping tendency and poor social support are identified as associated factors. Nursing staff should provide targeted interventions to reduce patients' uncertainty and enhance their psychological adaptation, thereby facilitating postoperative recovery and improving quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.