ReviewESMO open2026
Hope and despair in cancer and other illnesses: a clinical framework for adaptive hope across the illness trajectory.
Review in ESMO open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- More than survival curves: why every oncologist has to read this article on adaptive hope.ESMO open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hope and despair are central and often coexisting dimensions of the experience of cancer and other serious illnesses. Hope profoundly shapes how patients understand prognosis, engage with treatment, and make decisions across the illness trajectory. When poorly managed, hope may contribute to prognostic misunderstanding, burdensome overtreatment, erosion of trust, and clinician distress. This narrative review synthesizes empirical and conceptual literature on hope and despair in oncology and serious illness, examining their determinants, clinical manifestations, and implications for communication and decision making. Hope is presented as a dynamic, multidimensional construct that evolves over time. Although initially oriented toward cure or remission, hope often recalibrates toward achievable goals such as symptom control, maintenance of function, relational connection, meaning, dignity, reconciliation, and spiritual peace. Hope and despair are shaped by physical symptoms, psychological state, social context, cultural frameworks, spirituality, and existential concerns. Hope for exceptional outcomes or miracles is common and may coexist with realistic planning and adaptive coping. However, when hope becomes rigid or reality-incongruent, it may impair informed decision making and delay emotional and practical preparation for decline and death. Effective clinical care requires the capacity to sustain adaptive, reality-congruent hope through honest, compassionate, and relationally grounded communication. The review examines psychospiritual, relational, and interdisciplinary approaches that support adaptive hope, including empathic communication, symptom management, meaning-centered interventions, dignity-conserving care, spiritual support, and structured hope-enhancing strategies. The role of clinicians' own reflective and emotional capacities in sustaining hope-supportive care is also explored. Fostering adaptive hope is presented as a core clinical competency in oncology and serious illness care. Integrating communication training, interdisciplinary collaboration, and existentially informed care may improve patient-centered decision making, reduce distress, and enhance the quality of care across the illness trajectory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42785913What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.