ArticleEBioMedicine2026
The GrimAge clock corresponds to brain ageing and social determinants of health in people with HIV.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDNA methylation (DNAm)-based epigenetic clocks can measure biological ageing. However, newer epigenetic clocks sensitive to morbidity, mortality, and longitudinal change have not been compared to brain health biomarkers in virally suppressed people with HIV (PWH) and without HIV (PWoH).
methodsParticipants in this case-control study underwent blood draws, brain MRI, and neuropsychological testing. Four DNAm-based epigenetic clocks were calculated: GrimAge (mortality-predictive), PhenoAge (morbidity-sensitive), DunedinPACE (longitudinal), and DNAm telomere length. Clocks were correlated with MRI features and cognitive domains. Neighbourhood socioeconomics, unemployment, early life stress, education, and medical comorbidities were examined as risk factors for epigenetic ageing.
findings126 virologically suppressed PWH (age = 53.8 ± 12.2 yr) and 145 PWoH (age = 48.1 ± 16.4) participated. Elevated GrimAge (p < 0.001; +1.8 years), PhenoAge (p = 0.002; +2.4 years), and DunedinPACE (p < 0.001; +5.1% ageing rate) were found for PWH vs. PWoH, controlling for demographic factors. Predicted telomere length was shorter for PWH vs. PWoH (p < 0.001). GrimAge correlated with brain age gap (p = 0.002; +5.9 years of brain age per decade of GrimAge) across all participants. Epigenetic clocks were linked to poorer cognition in specific domains. Area Deprivation Index was positively associated with GrimAge (p = 0.001) in PWH, while education was negatively associated (p = 0.002). Cardiovascular risk was associated with increased GrimAge (p = 0.008) across all participants.
interpretationBiological age alterations persist in PWH despite viral suppression, as revealed by multiple epigenetic clocks. GrimAge and other clocks are linked with brain morphology and cognitive dysfunction. Results suggest that biological ageing is influenced by modifiable social and comorbid risk factors.
fundingUnited States National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Nursing Research) and amfAR, The Foundation for AIDS Research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.