ArticleBrazilian journal of physical therapy2026
Does timing of physical exercise after reconstructive prolapse surgery matter?
Article in Brazilian journal of physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects many women and impacts quality of life. Evidence on physical activity in this population is inconsistent, particularly across the postoperative period.
objectiveTo describe patterns of physical activity and evaluate their associations with symptoms and QOL before and after reconstructive prolapse surgery.
methodsThis secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial used a descriptive and exploratory approach. A total of 466 patients were divided into two groups based on prolapse stage: stage II (n = 137) and stage III-IV (n = 329). Physical activity was measured using the metabolic equivalent task (MET). Secondary outcomes included the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ). The mixed model was used to analyze the MET, POP symptoms, and QoL at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery.
resultsRegardless of prolapse stage, most patients were inactive at baseline (54.5%vs. 58.7%) and at 3 months (55.3%vs. 54.6%). By 12 months post-surgery, more patients became active (58.4%vs. 59.4%). No significant difference in MET was observed between groups over time (95% CI: [-219.9; 65.5]; p = 0.29). Similarly, no significant differences were found in symptoms and QoL (p > 0.05 for all comparisons).
conclusionIrrespective of prolapse stage, patients showed similar physical activity levels at baseline, 3- and 12-months after surgery. Although no inferences can be made regarding timing or effects of postoperative exercise, there were no differences in symptoms and QoL between the groups over the course of one year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.