ReviewThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2026
Evoke (+) trials of semaglutide for early alzheimer's disease: Innovations, lessons, and implications.
Review in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The evoke and evoke+ trials for the treatment of early Alzheimer's disease (AD) with semaglutide were founded on the observation that semaglutide reduced the incidence of dementia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Non-clinical investigations support an effect of semaglutide on AD pathology. The evoke and evoke+ trials were large, well conducted, and innovative. These trials were negative, showing no clinical benefit of treatment with 14 milligrams of semaglutide for two years. Semaglutide produced a statistically significant and robust reduction in high sensitivity C-reactive protein consistent with suppression of peripheral inflammation. There was no effect on most plasma measures collected. CSF analyses showed nominally significant effects on biomarkers of the core biology of AD; YKL-40 and glial fibrillary acidic protein in CSF were decreased indicating a reduction in astroglial activation. The magnitude of these changes was small (7%-10%) and there was no correlative effect on AD progression. The discrepancy between observations in real world data and the trial outcomes indicates that treatment of symptomatic AD confirmed with biomarkers differs from treatment of patients with diabetes who were cognitively unimpaired and at risk for all cause cognitive decline. The evoke and evoke+ trials suggest that reduction in peripheral inflammation may be insufficient to produce beneficial clinical effects in AD. The results of the evoke(+) trials do not exclude the possibility that AD populations enriched for elevated levels of markers of peripheral inflammation or use of brain penetrant GLP-1 RAs could produce therapeutic benefit.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.