ArticlePoultry science2026
Evaluation of the effects of black soldier fly larval hydrolysate on layer chicks.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of dietary supplementation with black soldier fly larval hydrolysate (BSFH), an un-defatted crude hydrolysate, on the growth performance, immune organ indices, serum biochemical parameters, antioxidant status, intestinal morphology, and cecal microbiota of layer chicks. A total of 360 one-day-old Gushi layer chicks were randomly allocated to four treatment groups: a control group fed a corn-soybean meal basal diet and three experimental groups (E3, E6, and E9) supplemented with 0.3%, 0.6%, and 0.9% BSFH, respectively. The experimental period lasted for 63 days. Results indicated that BSFH supplementation dose-dependently improved average daily gain and feed-to-gain ratio. Average daily gain was significantly increased at the 0.6% and 0.9% levels, whereas feed-to-gain ratio was significantly improved only at the 0.9% level, with the 0.3% and 0.6% levels showing numerical trends; average daily feed intake was not significantly affected. BSFH supplementation did not significantly affect spleen or Fabricius bursa indices. At the serum biochemical level, BSFH at 0.3% and 0.6% significantly reduced alanine aminotransferase activity, while uric acid levels were dose-dependently decreased, with significant reductions observed at 0.6% and 0.9% supplementation levels; serum albumin was significantly increased at the 0.3% and 0.6% levels, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol showed a linear increasing trend with supplementation level. BSFH also enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities, with serum glutathione peroxidase and catalase peaking at the 0.3% level, serum total superoxide dismutase peaking at the 0.6% level, and hepatic catalase being highest at the 0.6% level. Intestinal morphology analysis revealed that BSFH reduced jejunal crypt depth and increased the villus height to crypt depth ratio, with these effects observed specifically in the jejunum, while no significant changes were detected in the duodenum or ileum. Cecal microbiota analysis indicated that BSFH did not significantly alter overall microbial diversity but enriched the genus Fusobacterium in the cecum, with the highest relative abundance observed at the 0.6% supplementation level; species-level sequencing is warranted to clarify the functional implications of this shift. These findings suggest that BSFH is a promising and sustainable protein source for poultry feed, capable of promoting growth and potentially improving the overall health status of layer chicks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.