ArticlePreventing chronic disease2026
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of the Physician's Role in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Primary Care Patients in Msaken, Tunisia, 2026.
Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health concern worldwide and an emerging health issue in Tunisia. Early screening is critical for prevention and early diagnosis. Our study aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to CRC screening among primary care patients and to examine factors associated with screening acceptance, including the perceived role of physicians, as well as the barriers to discussing CRC. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among adults consulting primary health care centers in Msaken, Tunisia, in January 2026. Data were collected by using a validated, structured questionnaire that assessed sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of CRC and screening methods, sources of information, physician-patient communication, attitudes toward screening, and perceived barriers. Associations were analyzed by using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: The study sample consisted of 701 participants. Among them, 72.0% had heard of CRC, but only 5.8% correctly identified the recommended age for screening. Almost one-third (32.8%) reported awareness of the hemoccult test, and 64.6% expressed willingness to undergo the test if it was free. We identified several independently associated factors with acceptance of a hemoccult test, including prior awareness of CRC (odds ratio [OR] = 2.18; P < .001), family history of CRC (OR = 2.00; P < .001), exposure to medical internet sources (OR = 2.06; P < .001), and prior discussion with a physician (OR = 2.46; P < .001). Conclusion: Although patient attitudes were generally positive, we found notable gaps in knowledge and screening practices. The strongest determinant of screening acceptance was doctor-patient communication, which shows the importance of the role primary care physicians in CRC prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.