ArticlePreventing chronic disease2026
Association Between Various Metrics of the Rural Food Environment and Diabetes and Obesity.
Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Associations between unhealthy food environments and increased risk of diabetes or obesity have been studied extensively in urban areas but less so in rural areas. To address this gap, we performed a geographically detailed study of the rural food environment, summarizing and assessing various measures and identifying their association with a higher rate of diabetes and obesity. Methods: We surveyed 1,311 residents of Sullivan County, New York, collecting data on demographic characteristics and health status in January 2021. We assessed the food environment by cataloging restaurants and retail food stores and used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to identify metrics strongly associated with diabetes and obesity (body mass index >30.0). We compared absolute proximity, density, relative proportions, and modified retail food environment index metrics. We applied fixed distance bands and nearest-neighbor approaches for proportions. Results: Older age (LASSO = +0.276), nearest-neighbor proportion of fast food restaurants (LASSO = +0.155), and low income (LASSO = +0.150) were associated with higher diabetes rates. Nearest-neighbor proportion (LASSO = +0.269), density per square mile of groceries/supermarkets (LASSO = +0.247), and Hispanic ethnicity (LASSO = +0.181) were the strongest predictors of obesity. Nearest-neighbor metrics helped with the problem of frequent zeros: the least skewed measures were fast food restaurants with 20 nearest neighbors (P = .37 for skewness) and counter-service restaurants with 20 nearest neighbors (P = .81). Conclusion: Nearest-neighbor approaches were less skewed to other metrics based on fixed distance bands, proximity, and density. Food environment metrics must be fully described and validated, especially in rural environments, before they are applied in research on critical health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.