ArticlePloS one2026
Predicting student academic performance using TabPFN and SHAP: An interpretable machine learning approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting student academic performance is of significant importance for enabling timely educational interventions and improving educational outcomes in secondary education. However, existing predictive models in educational data mining often face the dual challenges of limited interpretability and suboptimal performance on small to medium-sized datasets. This study introduces the Prior-Data Fitted Network (TabPFN) combined with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to construct an interpretable machine learning framework for predicting student achievement. Utilizing a publicly available dataset of 4,000 Spanish high school students (SAP-4000), we employed 10-fold cross-validation to train and compare eight machine learning models. The results demonstrate that TabPFN achieves superior predictive performance, with an RMSE of 4.8454, an R2 of 0.9216, and an MAE of 3.7950, outperforming traditional models. Comparative analyses across varying data scales indicate that TabPFN maintains high accuracy even when sample sizes are reduced to 500 samples, achieving performance comparable to or better than what traditional models attained at 3,500 samples, exhibiting stronger robustness than commonly used ensemble learning methods such as XGBoost. SHAP analysis reveals that learning behavior and study habit features-specifically weekly study hours, attendance rate, and tutoring status-play a decisive role in predicting academic performance. The proposed framework combines strong predictive performance with interpretability, overcoming the "black-box" limitation prevalent in existing algorithms. It is well-suited for small to medium-scale data modeling tasks in the educational domain, providing technical support for personalized instruction and intervention, while also offering methodological references for future research. An additional case study on a distinct student performance dataset further confirms the model's robustness and generalizability across different educational prediction tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.