ArticlePloS one2026
Improving the accuracy of distributed cooperative positioning at urban intersections based on mathematical analysis and robust filtering.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To improve the cooperative positioning accuracy of urban intersections under conditions of global positioning system signal blockage and complex traffic flow, this paper proposes a cooperative positioning model that integrates a mathematical analytical Gaussian belief propagation robust filtering algorithm with a spatial attention mechanism. A hardware verification platform integrating roadside sensing units, connected test vehicles, and 5G-vehicle-to-everything communication is constructed to achieve distributed cooperative positioning analysis of urban intersections. The results show that the proposed fusion model exhibits the best overall performance in intersection cooperative positioning, with a root mean square error of only 0.15 m, significantly lower than both single algorithms and the spatiotemporal attention model. The geometric accuracy attenuation factor is as low as 1.8, the effective cooperative gain reaches 60%, and the positioning coverage rate reaches 98%. However, experimental results under ring-topology, high-density congestion, and communication failure scenarios indicate a noticeable performance degradation, suggesting that the robustness of the proposed method is limited under extreme network conditions. The integrated design of "mathematical model analysis - dynamic feature extraction - vehicle-road cooperative fusion" can effectively achieve a leap in intersection positioning accuracy from single-vehicle intelligence to group collaboration, providing key technical support for reliable perception of smart intersections and connected autonomous driving.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.