ArticlePloS one2026
A cluster analysis of neonates using clinical signs of possible serious bacterial infection at hospital admission in Kenya: A retrospective multicentre cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeonatal sepsis remains a major cause of mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Despite presenting with considerable clinical heterogeneity, suspected cases are managed uniformly with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Typical data-driven approaches developed in high-resource settings to identify clinically meaningful phenotypes and support management of neonatal sepsis have limited generalisability to many SSA public hospital settings, due to inclusion of variables that are largely unavailable at admission. This study's objective was to identify sepsis clusters using signs of possible Serious Bacterial Infection (pSBI) readily available at the time of admission, and to assess the clusters performance in predicting mortality.
methodsWe conducted unsupervised model-based cluster analysis using Latent Class Analysis based on pSBI data collected at admission. All neonates <28 days old admitted to 21 Kenyan hospitals between January 2022 and December 2024 with ≥1 pSBI sign/symptom at admission were eligible for inclusion. We further explored the external validity of this clustering approach on new patient populations, and assessed the ability of the identified clusters to accurately predict in-hospital mortality compared to the World Health Organization neonatal sepsis severity classification guidelines.
resultsFive clusters of minimal, low, moderate, substantial and critical mortality risk were identified from development dataset with 33094 patients from eight hospitals. The models had an accuracy, positive predictive value and specificity of at least 83.16% (82.72% to 83.62%), 81.02% (80.58% to 81.45%) and 86.91% (86.61% to 87.23%) respectively in predicting cluster membership of 23704 patients in the external validation dataset admitted to thirteen different hospitals. From an internal-external cross-validation approach of the in-hospital mortality risk, the model-based clustering approach had discrimination (AUROC) of 0.867 (0.863 to 0.871) and calibration intercept and slope of -0.004 (-0.031 to 0.023) and 0.996 (0.979 to 1.014) respectively, outperforming the WHO sepsis severity classification whose discrimination was 0.721 (0.715 to 0.727) and calibration intercept and slope being 0.018 (-0.005 to 0.041) and 1.015 (0.986 to 1.043) respectively.
conclusionThe identified clusters can complement clinicians' judgement in assessing risk among neonates with sepsis at admission. Future work evaluating the utility of these clusters and potential differences in treatment response across clusters are therefore recommended to help strengthen the case for more targeted, risk-based neonatal sepsis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.