ArticlePloS one2026
Prognostic associations of anthropometric indices with major health outcomes: A nationwide cohort study of 1.1 million adults.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe global escalation of obesity necessitates precise tools for assessing diverse health risks. This study aimed to compare the prognostic associations of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and the body roundness index (BRI) across multiple cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in a large cohort of Korean adults using a nationwide database.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 1,199,633 Korean adults (aged ≥55 years) from the National Health Insurance Service database. Prognostic association for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), all-cause mortality, and atrial fibrillation (AF) over a 10-year follow-up was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsNo single index consistently outperformed the others; rather, association was outcome-specific. BRI demonstrated the highest discrimination for ASCVD (AUC: 0.553) compared to WC (0.540) and BMI (0.512; P < 0.05 for all). Conversely, BMI showed the highest AUC for all-cause mortality (0.595), largely due to a significant inverse relationship in the underweight category. For incident AF, WC showed the highest AUC (0.567), followed by BRI (0.550) and BMI (0.527). Restricted cubic spline analyses revealed non-linear (U-shaped or J-shaped) relationships for most outcomes.
conclusionsThese findings indicate that each anthropometric index captures distinct biological aspects of adiposity, highlighting the need to consider the specific clinical outcome when interpreting obesity-related risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.