Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42784577›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Glycan reachability analysis: A bottleneck-aware framework for inferring tissue-specific glycan biosynthetic potential from transcriptomics.

Yusuke Matsui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yusuke MatsuiBiomedical and Health Informatics Unit, Department of Integrated Health Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3977-4313

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glycan biosynthesis requires the coordinated expression of glycosyltransferases, modifying enzymes, and nucleotide-sugar synthesis and transport machinery. Existing computational tools predict glycan structures from gene expression using binary thresholds, losing quantitative information about relative biosynthetic capacity across tissues. Here we present glycan biosynthetic reachability analysis, which integrates expression-based Z-scores across curated pathway steps using AND/OR logic and minimum aggregation to produce continuous, tissue-comparable scores and an explicit expression-limiting step. Applied to 17,382 GTEx v8 RNA-seq samples across 54 human tissue types, reachability resolved quantitative differences hidden by presence/absence calls; for example, pancreas was 96% binary-positive for the sLeX pathway but had low median reachability (Z=-1.86). Bottleneck stability was evaluated across all 19 multi-step metrics. In independent HEK293 knockout glycomics, the minimum score contained information beyond a within-knockout permutation null but did not outperform naive mean aggregation or binary topology. Nested leave-one-knockout-out selection favored a relaxed low quantile (q = 0.2) rather than validating the strict minimum. Within-GTEx associations between reachability and signaling-response transcripts are reported only as transcriptomic coherence because predictors and readouts share the same RNA-seq source. The mouse tissue-glycome comparison remained null. Reachability is therefore a hypothesis-generating rank of transcriptomic potential, not a measure of enzymatic activity or glycan abundance.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingPolysaccharidesTranscriptomeAnimalsComputational BiologyGlycomicsGlycosyltransferasesHEK293 CellsHumansOrgan SpecificityGlycosyltransferasesPolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID42784577
PMCPMC13606954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.