ArticlePloS one2026
Comparative evaluation of convolutional and transformer-based object detection models for brain tumor localization in MRI.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a need to detect and precisely localize brain tumors based on medical imaging to ensure such tumors are diagnosed early and treated with the aim of a successful treatment. More recent developments in the field of deep learning have presented convolution-based and transformer-based object detection models that can be used to achieve high detection rates. We carry out an analogous comparison of YOLOv11s and RF-DETR(small) in brain tumor detection on annotated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data on Roboflow in this study. Precision, Recall and mean Average Precision (mAP) along with localization loss measures were used to train and test both models. Findings indicate that YOLOv11s performed better in terms of mAP@50 of 95.2 percent, precision of 93.6 percent, and recall of 91 percent compared to RF-DETR that reported mAP@50 of 94.3 percent, precision of 90.6 percent, and recall of 85 percent. The findings point to the improved performance of YOLOv11s to localize and classify tumor locations in varying MRI slices. YOLOv11s with less convergent dynamic training behavior and RF-DETR(small) with better localization based on more challenging Intersection over Union (IoU) thresholds. The primary challenge was ensuring a fair comparison between two fundamentally different detection paradigms that employ distinct feature-learning mechanisms, pretraining schemes, optimization settings, and computational characteristics. Despite these, our findings highlight the feasibility of integrating advanced object detection models into computer-aided diagnostic tools for robust brain tumor detection in complex MRI data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.