ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Generative artificial intelligence-assisted medical self-care and associated factors among undergraduate students at Arsi University, South-Eastern Ethiopia.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of social media and the availability of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technologies like ChatGPT and Gemini have significantly increased access to personalized health information. This has led to a rise in self-directed health behaviors such as self-diagnosis and self-medication. While GenAI can support informed self-care decisions, over-reliance on these technologies may result in incorrect self-medication and delayed consultations with medical professionals if not managed appropriately. However, there is a notable lack of systematic empirical data regarding GenAI-assisted medical self-care practices, particularly in Ethiopia. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of GenAI-assisted medical self-care and its influencing factors among undergraduate students at Arsi University in South-Eastern Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 414 randomly selected students using a self-administered questionnaire. Data were collected through Kobo Toolbox, and descriptive analyses alongside binary logistic regression were performed to identify factors associated with GenAI-assisted self-care. The study achieved a response rate of 97.87%, with participants having a mean age of 22.2 years. Results showed that 70.05% of students engaged in GenAI-assisted medical self-care. Factors positively associated with this behavior included being a second-year student (AOR=2.98), possessing good digital health literacy (AOR=1.71), awareness of GenAI technologies (AOR=2.18), a positive attitude towards these technologies (AOR=1.63), and recent health facility visits (AOR=2.46). Conversely, good health-seeking behavior (AOR=0.61) and infrequent health facility visits (AOR=0.49) were linked to lower odds of engaging in GenAI-assisted self-care. The findings suggest a high prevalence of GenAI-assisted self-care among university students and highlight the need for guidelines and training on digital health literacy for effective and safe technology use in healthcare.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.