ArticlePloS one2026
Leveraging GIS-based multi-criteria analysis for flood-prone area detection in Nsanje District, Malawi.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flooding remains one of the most severe and recurrent natural hazards in sub-Saharan Africa, posing persistent threats to rural livelihoods, infrastructure, and environmental stability. In Malawi, the Lower Shire River Valley, particularly Nsanje district, is highly vulnerable to recurrent flooding due to climatic variability, land-use change, and geomorphological characteristics. Despite the growing availability of geospatial data, localized flood vulnerability assessments remain limited, constraining effective disaster preparedness and land-use planning. This study applied a Geographic Information System-based multi-criteria analysis using the Analytical Hierarchy Process to identify flood-prone areas in Nsanje district, Malawi. Five key spatial parameters were integrated: land cover, precipitation, slope, proximity to water bodies, and elevation. The datasets included Sentinel-2 imagery, CHIRPS precipitation records, Shuttle Radar Topography Mission digital elevation data, and official hydrological data. The weighted overlay analysis revealed that land cover and precipitation were the dominant determinants of flood susceptibility, accounting for 59.4 percent and 21.0 percent of the total influence, respectively. The resulting flood susceptibility map showed a pronounced north-south gradient in vulnerability, with the southern corridor exhibiting the highest exposure to flooding. Traditional Authority Nyachikadza emerged as the most critically affected area, with more than 1,500 residents situated in high-risk zones, whereas Traditional Authorities Malemia and Tengani displayed moderate levels of vulnerability. The findings indicate that the combined effects of land-use practices, rainfall intensity, and terrain configuration strongly influence flood susceptibility in Nsanje. This study provides a cost-effective and replicable framework for flood risk assessment in data-scarce environments. By leveraging freely available satellite data and open-source geospatial tools, it offers actionable intelligence to support disaster management, spatial planning, and community resilience in flood-prone areas. This approach contributes to the broader sustainability agenda by informing climate adaptation strategies that are aligned with national and global commitments to disaster risk reduction and Sustainable Development Goals. The five-factor model used here should be read as a first-order, operationally feasible approximation of flood susceptibility; geology, soil permeability, and drainage density were not incorporated and are discussed as an explicit limitation, and the precipitation criterion reflects cumulative seasonal totals rather than storm-scale rainfall intensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.