ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Mechanical polarity links adhesion-regulated protrusions to directional stability in glioblastoma cell migration.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma invasion critically limits therapeutic outcomes, yet the physical principles that govern directional cell migration remain poorly understood. In particular, the degree to which protrusive forces are aligned or cancel each other, and how this governs migration efficiency, have remained unquantified. Here, we introduce mechanical polarity, a quantitative descriptor that captures the alignment of protrusive and adhesive forces driving migration. By integrating time-lapse imaging of the glioblastoma-derived cells with a coarse-grained biophysical model incorporating catch- and slip-bond kinetics, we analyzed motility on fibronectin- and laminin-coated substrates. In our model, the extracellular matrix (ECM) is treated as an external boundary condition that modulates adhesion dynamics, distinct from intrinsic cellular mechanics. We demonstrate that while protrusive activity remains similar across environments, the fibronectin-fitted model exhibited less stable effective adhesion dynamics that led to poorly coordinated protrusions and significant force cancellation, thereby reducing net displacement. These differences are not fully captured by conventional descriptors of protrusion activity but are reflected in mechanical polarity. Conversely, laminin promotes stable adhesions and the alignment of protrusive forces, a state characterized by high mechanical polarity. Our results support mechanical polarity as a candidate physical descriptor linking molecular adhesion kinetics to cell-scale migration stability. This framework provides a quantitative basis for understanding force coordination in glioblastoma cell motility and offers a physical basis for strategies to suppress invasive behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.