ReviewSports (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Impact of High-Intensity Interval Training on Aerobic Capacity, Muscle Strength, and Agility Among Football Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of High-Intensity Interval Training on Aerobic Capacity, Muscle Strength, and Agility Among Football Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is increasingly incorporated into football conditioning programmes to enhance aerobic fitness, muscular strength, and agility. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of HIIT on these performance outcomes in football players and explored the availability of evidence relating to injury outcomes. Six electronic information sources were searched for randomised and non-randomised controlled trials published between January 2010 and December 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using the Modified Downs and Black checklist, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Ten studies including 329 football players were included. Aerobic-fitness outcomes were synthesised narratively because heterogeneity in outcome measurement and reporting precluded reliable quantitative pooling. Individual studies demonstrated favourable changes, although superiority over comparator training was not consistently established. Muscle-strength outcomes were also synthesised narratively because sufficiently comparable independent-study data were unavailable. Two RCTs contributed to the agility meta-analysis; following harmonisation of the direction of time-based outcomes, no significant advantage of HIIT over comparator training was observed (SMD = -0.29, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.25;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.