ReviewSports (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Training and Preparation Methods Relevant to Elite 5000 m Track Performance: A Systematic Review.
Review in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elite 5000 m track performance depends on the integration of endurance training, race-specific speed, tactical decision-making, technology, physiological characteristics, and individualized athlete support. This systematic review synthesized peer-reviewed evidence available as open-access full texts that was either specific to the 5000 m event or explicitly applicable to elite 5000 m preparation. Searches of SPORTDiscus, ProQuest Central, Scopus, and PsycINFO were completed in February 2025 and updated on 17 August 2026, with reporting guided by PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S and narrative synthesis structured with reference to SWiM. Following duplicate removal, 1439 records were screened; 430 reports were sought, 39 were not retrieved, 391 were assessed, and 11 publications met the deliberately narrow event-relevance criteria. The update search identified 11 records; three duplicates were removed, eight unique records were screened, and no additional eligible publication was identified. Methodological and reporting quality were appraised using QuADS. Evidence was considered separately across warm-up, training-intensity distribution, tapering, altitude exposure/training responses, pacing/tactical behavior, footwear technology, physiological profiling/performance determinants, and nutrition. The most direct event-specific evidence comprised a 5000 m warm-up trial in trained runners and observational championship pacing analyses, whereas most other evidence was indirect to exclusive elite 5000 m specialists. Confidence was low or very low across components. The pragmatic open-access retrieval restriction, small evidence base, methodological heterogeneity, restricted database coverage, and indirectness limit certainty and generalizability. The findings should therefore be interpreted as conditional considerations rather than prescriptive recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.