Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42784314›Full record

ReviewToxins2026

Twenty-Five Years of Human Urinary Biomonitoring of Mycotoxins: Analytical Advances and Applications in Risk Assessment.

Oana Mîrza, Denisia Pașca, Lara Manyes, Anamaria Cozma-Petruț, Roxana Banc, Simona Codruța Hegheș, Lorena Filip, Béla Kiss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Oana MîrzaDepartment of Bromatology, Hygiene, Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 6 Louis Pasteur, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3771-9003
Denisia PașcaFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 6 Louis Pasteur, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Lara ManyesBiotech AgriFood Lab, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, University of Valencia, Burjassot, 46100 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5777-6107
Anamaria Cozma-PetruțDepartment of Bromatology, Hygiene, Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 6 Louis Pasteur, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4381-5544
Roxana BancDepartment of Bromatology, Hygiene, Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 6 Louis Pasteur, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6808-5723
Simona Codruța HegheșDepartment of Drug Analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, "luliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 6 Louis Pasteur Street, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7823-4390
Lorena FilipDepartment of Bromatology, Hygiene, Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 6 Louis Pasteur, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9469-3546
Béla KissLaboratory of Toxicology, Institute of Forensic Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Clinicilor, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3036-5345

Funding

Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CNCS - UEFISCDI PN-III-P1-1.1-PD-2019-1171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycotoxins are secondary fungal metabolites that have continuously attracted research interest, both for their potential negative effects on animal and human health and for the economic losses they entail. Studies assessing exposure to mycotoxins have become increasingly widespread. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive description of mycotoxins and to evaluate the evolution of research on monitoring mycotoxin exposure using human urine samples, concerning analytical techniques and occurrence. Studies published in English over the last 25 years from four databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus) were analyzed. Evaluating 73 original articles, a constant interest in the analysis of ochratoxin A in human urine samples could be observed (maximum level 148 ng/mL), a fact also justified by its demonstrated toxicity. The most commonly used analytical technique to evaluate mycotoxin presence in human urine was liquid chromatography coupled with high-performance detectors. The limitations of the review include the large period covered and the lack of mycotoxin concentrations expressed in ng biomarker/mL urine in some articles. Finally, an overview of how mycotoxin levels in human urine can be applied to mycotoxin exposure risk assessment was included.

Indexed as

Biological MonitoringMycotoxinsAnimalsBiomarkersEnvironmental ExposureHumansRisk AssessmentBiomarkersMycotoxinsbiological fluidsbiomonitoringhuman exposuremycotoxinsrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID42784314
PMCPMC13611662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.