ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Secondary Prevention Bundle for Drug-Related Problems in an Integrated Healthcare Setting: A Pragmatic Observational Implementation-Effectiveness Study.
Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the implementation and associated 30-day outcomes of the "Medication Code" (MC), a secondary prevention bundle for drug-related problems (DRPs), implemented at the Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (CST), an integrated healthcare organization in Catalonia. The bundle, which combines medication reconciliation, structured medication review, and coordinated communication with primary care, was previously shown to reduce 30-day readmissions in a randomized trial at a large tertiary hospital. Between May 2024 and December 2025, 185 patients attending the emergency department (ED) at CST for a DRP received the secondary prevention intervention bundle. The study assesses the association between implementation of the recommendations and 30-day outcomes, not the effect of the MC bundle itself. Treatment optimization proposals were implemented in 72.4% of patients, either at discharge or during primary care follow-up, supported by a multiprofessional integrated team of pharmacists and primary care practitioners. Implementation of the pharmacotherapeutic proposals was associated with an absolut risk reduction of 30-day ED revisits and DRP-related readmissions. These findings are consistent with previous observations from the original MC program. However, because all included patients received the intervention bundle and outcomes were compared according to implementation status, the study cannot estimate the effectiveness of the MC bundle itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.