Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42784199›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

From Nanoparticles to Microparticles in Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation: Transport, Incorporation, and Coating Performance.

Aydin Bordbar-Khiabani, Sara Bahrampour

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aydin Bordbar-KhiabaniVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Tekniikantie 21, FI-02150 Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6356-3140
Sara BahrampourIndependent Researcher, FI-00750 Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) can incorporate suspended particles from the electrolyte into growing ceramic-like oxide coatings, but particle size strongly affects their transport, capture, transformation, and final distribution. This review compares nanoparticle and microparticle additions, with particular emphasis on suspension stability, electrophoretic and convective transport, access to discharge channels, interaction with transient oxide melts, and distribution across the coating thickness. Well-dispersed nanoparticles generally remain suspended more readily, access finer pores, and undergo more extensive interfacial reaction or dissolution, whereas microparticles are more strongly affected by sedimentation and are more often retained as discrete or partially fused inclusions in outer coating regions. These differences influence coating morphology, porosity, roughness, phase evolution, hardness, wear and corrosion resistance, photocatalytic activity, and biofunctionality. Primary particle size alone, however, is insufficient to predict coating behavior because agglomeration, surface charge, particle morphology, electrolyte chemistry, waveform, and reactor hydrodynamics can alter the effective size-dependent response. Meaningful comparisons of particle-assisted PEO coatings should therefore account for the effective in-bath particle size and suspension state.

Indexed as

bioactivitycomposite coatingscorrosion resistancefunctional surfacesincorporation mechanismmicroparticlesnanoparticlesparticle size effectplasma electrolytic oxidationsuspension stability

Identifiers

PMID42784199
PMCPMC13610332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.