ArticleNeurology international2026
Insertion of a Postoperative Drain After Surgeries for Intracranial Abscesses or Empyemas-A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Article in Neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe routine insertion of a postoperative intracranial drain following surgical evacuation of brain abscesses or subdural empyemas is practiced by some surgeons to facilitate pus evacuation and to enable cavity lavage, but robust evidence for clinical benefit is lacking. This study evaluates whether postoperative drain placement affects reoperation rates, length of hospital stay, and duration of antibiotic therapy.
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of consecutive adult patients who underwent surgical drainage or excision of a primary intracranial abscess or empyema at our tertiary center between January 2020 and January 2026. Patients were grouped by whether a postoperative intracranial drain was placed. The primary endpoint was recurrence requiring reoperation. Secondary endpoints included hospital length of stay, total duration of antibiotic therapy, and operative time. Continuous variables were compared with t-tests and categorical variables with Fisher's exact test;
resultsEighty procedures were identified, and 36 patients met inclusion criteria for final analysis; eight (22.2%) received a postoperative intracranial drain, and 28 (77.8%) did not. Overall, 13 patients (36.1%) required reoperation for radiological or clinical progression. Reoperation occurred in 50% of patients with a drain and 32.1% without a drain (
conclusionsIn this single-center retrospective cohort, placement of a postoperative intracranial drain after surgical management of brain abscesses or empyemas was not associated with reduced reoperation rates, shorter hospitalization, or shorter antibiotic treatment. Given the absence of demonstrable clinical benefit and the potential risks related to drain placement, routine insertion of postoperative drains cannot be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.