ReviewNursing reports (Pavia, Italy)2026
Patient-Specific Vascular Anatomy for Bedside Safety: A Targeted Narrative Review and the VASC-N Framework.
Review in Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Canonical vascular diagrams do not capture patient-specific differences in vessel identity, course, depth, calibre, branching, adjacency, dynamic behaviour, or post-procedural route. This targeted narrative review with purposive publication selection had two objectives: to synthesise vascular anatomical evidence relevant to nursing and health professions practice and education, and to use that synthesis to propose an action-oriented conceptual framework. PubMed/MEDLINE and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception to 2 August 2026. After exact DOI and normalised-title deduplication, 1683 unique records underwent title/abstract inspection and keyword-assisted prioritisation; 56 information-rich human anatomical, ultrasonographic, clinical, educational, and sentinel case publications were purposively retained for full-text evidence charting and narrative synthesis. The synthesis identified six interpretive anatomy-to-risk mechanisms: possible vessel misidentification, unsafe neurovascular adjacency, device-vessel mismatch, dynamic positional change, misinterpretation of anomalous central routes, and loss of patient-specific anatomical knowledge between encounters. These categories are qualitative synthesis outputs, not frequency estimates or causal effects. The literature informed VASC-N-Verify; Assess; Scan and distinguish; Choose, adapt, and confirm; and Note, notify, and nurture learning-as an author-developed conceptual framework of proposed observable behaviours. A preliminary Nursing Actionability Test and minimum reporting checklist were also developed. Patient-specific vascular anatomy becomes educationally and clinically relevant when recognition may change a decision, support proportionate verification or escalation, preserve future access, or strengthen assessment. VASC-N and the accompanying tools have not been validated; prospective content-validity, feasibility, reliability, educational-transfer, and clinical-outcome studies are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.