Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42784052›Full record

ArticleMuscles (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Do Sprinters and Jumpers Differ in the Acute Countermovement-Jump Response to Isometric Conditioning Protocols? An Exploratory Study.

Atila Salaj, Hrvoje Ajman, Frane Žuvela, Petar Šušnjara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Muscles (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Atila SalajFaculty of Kinesiology Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia.ORCID 0009-0003-2063-123X
Hrvoje AjmanFaculty of Kinesiology Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-3663-4008
Frane ŽuvelaFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0009-0004-0066-8040
Petar ŠušnjaraFaculty of Kinesiology Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-9158-2779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sprinters and jumpers differ in their force-velocity demands, so this exploratory study compared their acute countermovement jump (CMJ) response to isometric conditioning.

methodsTwenty-two competitive track and field athletes (10 sprinters, 12 jumpers; 19.1 ± 3.3 y) were alternately allocated from a randomised list to a 3 × 5 s isometric knee-extension or isometric half-squat (

resultsSprinters increased (+2.40 ± 4.46%) whereas jumpers decreased (-2.02 ± 6.44%). Discipline and protocol were analysed jointly in one additive model. The protocol contrast was small and imprecise (-0.25 percentage points [ISO-SQ relative to IKE], 95% CI -5.50 to 5.00;

conclusionsThe primary comparison was inconclusive and materially attenuated by age adjustment but directionally consistent across trial summaries and protocols. The observed discipline-dependent pattern is hypothesis-generating and requires confirmation in adequately powered, controlled trials.

Indexed as

conditioning activitycountermovement jumpindividual responsepost-activation performance enhancementtrack and field

Identifiers

PMID42784052
PMCPMC13610297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.