ArticleMuscles (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Elbow Flexor Adaptations to Failure Versus Repetitions-in-Reserve Training: A Unilateral Within-Participant Study in Resistance-Trained Adults.
Article in Muscles (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study compared elbow flexor hypertrophy and maximal strength adaptations after eight weeks of resistance training performed either to momentary muscular failure or with 1-3 repetitions in reserve (RIR). Nineteen resistance-trained adults completed a unilateral within-participant protocol in which one arm trained to failure and the contralateral arm trained with 1-3 RIR. Participants trained twice weekly using the unilateral preacher curl exercise at 70-80% one-repetition maximum (1RM). Elbow flexor muscle thickness and 1RM strength were assessed before and after the intervention. Bayesian mixed-effects models estimated between-condition differences. Both protocols increased muscle thickness and 1RM strength. The estimated between-condition differences for muscle thickness were 0.032 cm (95% highest density interval [HDI]: -0.044 to 0.113) while the estimated difference in 1RM strength was 0.588 kg (85% HDI: -0.491 to 1.66), with both 95% HDIs spanning zero and including values favoring either protocol. Sex-specific analyses showed the same general patter of responses. Overall, resistance training performed with 1-3 RIR produces similar elbow flexor hypertrophy and maximal strength adaptations to training performed to momentary muscular failures under the loading and volume conditions examined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.