ArticleJournal of imaging2026
The Anatomy of Facial Muscles Revisited: High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Studies on Body Donors.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The facial muscles are crucial for nonverbal communication, physiological functions, and articulation. Unlike skeletal or masticatory muscles, they lack fascia, attach directly to the skin and function without joint-mediated movements or visual feedback. The aim of this study was to reconstruct the facial musculature using high-resolution computerised tomography (CT) and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on 14 body donors, yielding segmented 3D datasets of the facial muscles, as well as bony and soft-tissue head structures. We hypothesise that the facial musculature comprises functional subunits with variable geometries that extend beyond classical anatomical definitions, with attachment points and three-dimensional positioning that differ from conventional descriptions. The most significant finding was that MRI could not resolve individual facial muscles as depicted in anatomical atlases. Instead, the musculature appeared as a single continuous sheet of muscle, embedded in fatty tissue and not attached to the bone. Whether the facial musculature is in fact continuous or consists of several muscles connected by connective tissue remains unclear. The difficulty of segmentation varied depending on the region; the zygomatic muscle was the easiest to separate, whilst the orbicularis oculi, frontalis and platysma muscles proved particularly difficult due to their thin, flat morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.