Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42783883›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

The Anatomy of Facial Muscles Revisited: High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Studies on Body Donors.

Heiko Stark, Kenny Jandausch, Angelina Roth, Uta Biedermann, Martin Krämer, Jürgen R Reichenbach, Rene Aschenbach, Gerd Fabian Volk, Martin S Fischer, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Heiko StarkInstitute of Zoology and Evolutionary Research with Phyletic Museum, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07737 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6450-9744
Kenny JandauschDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, 07740 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7132-0963
Angelina RothDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, 07740 Jena, Germany.
Uta BiedermannInstitute of Anatomy, Jena University Hospital, 07740 Jena, Germany.
Martin KrämerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Jena University Hospital, 07740 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0173-9830
Jürgen R ReichenbachMedical Physics Group, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Jena University Hospital, 07740 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2640-0630
Rene AschenbachInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Jena University Hospital, 07740 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3775-0449
Gerd Fabian VolkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, 07740 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1245-6331
Martin S FischerInstitute of Zoology and Evolutionary Research with Phyletic Museum, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07737 Jena, Germany.
Orlando Guntinas-LichiusDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, 07740 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9671-0784

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 513971995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The facial muscles are crucial for nonverbal communication, physiological functions, and articulation. Unlike skeletal or masticatory muscles, they lack fascia, attach directly to the skin and function without joint-mediated movements or visual feedback. The aim of this study was to reconstruct the facial musculature using high-resolution computerised tomography (CT) and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on 14 body donors, yielding segmented 3D datasets of the facial muscles, as well as bony and soft-tissue head structures. We hypothesise that the facial musculature comprises functional subunits with variable geometries that extend beyond classical anatomical definitions, with attachment points and three-dimensional positioning that differ from conventional descriptions. The most significant finding was that MRI could not resolve individual facial muscles as depicted in anatomical atlases. Instead, the musculature appeared as a single continuous sheet of muscle, embedded in fatty tissue and not attached to the bone. Whether the facial musculature is in fact continuous or consists of several muscles connected by connective tissue remains unclear. The difficulty of segmentation varied depending on the region; the zygomatic muscle was the easiest to separate, whilst the orbicularis oculi, frontalis and platysma muscles proved particularly difficult due to their thin, flat morphology.

Indexed as

anatomycomputed tomographyfacefacial musclesfacial nerveimagingmagnetic resonance imagingmimictopography

Identifiers

PMID42783883
PMCPMC13608583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.