Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42783863›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

A Conventional Framework for Reflection Removal Using Single Images.

Mehwish Arif, Khawar Khurshid, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan Gul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mehwish ArifSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0001-2590-786X
Khawar KhurshidDepartment of Computer Science, Namal University, Mianwali 42250, Pakistan.
Muhammad Shahzeb Khan GulFraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2679-9733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reflections caused by poor lighting conditions or the presence of transparent media such as glass often degrade image quality by introducing unwanted visual artifacts and obscuring important scene information. These reflections not only reduce the perceptual quality of images but also adversely affect the performance of downstream computer vision applications. Reflection removal is therefore a critical pre-processing step for enhancing image quality and improving the reliability of vision-based systems. In this paper, we propose a pipeline framework that employs individual components from established prior works on reflection removal. The proposed method uses a hierarchical thresholding consisting of two stages to extract a reflection-free structure layer. DCT and soft matting suppress reflection components in the texture layer while preserving important image details. The performance of the proposed approach was evaluated on a benchmark dataset developed by ROSE Lab at Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Experimental results, assessed using multiple quantitative and perceptual quality metrics, demonstrate that the proposed method effectively suppresses reflections, produces images with fewer unnatural artifacts, and achieves improved perceptual quality relative to the baseline methods evaluated in the study, based on no-reference metrics' results. The competitive visual quality and natural appearance of the restored images suggest the proposed framework may be a promising candidate for pre-processing in computer vision applications.

Indexed as

perceptual image qualityreflection removalsoft mattingstructure layertexture layertwo-stage thresholding

Identifiers

PMID42783863
PMCPMC13608750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.