ArticleJournal of imaging2026
A Multimodal AI Framework for Medical Education: Integrating Adaptive Image Retrieval, Fast Synthesis, and LLM-Based Clinical Auditing.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Access to reliable medical images is essential for clinical training. To address this need, this paper presents an extended version of MIRAGE, a multimodal retrieval and generation system that utilizes a shared latent space to process medical queries by retrieving real images from the ROCO dataset, generating synthetic scans, and providing LLM-based clinical descriptions alongside dual-concept visual comparisons. To overcome previous computational limits and the lack of clinical validation, we introduce three core enhancements: first, an Auto-α module to dynamically weight visual and textual similarities; second, the integration of LCM-LoRA to accelerate synthetic image generation; and third, an automated clinical auditor based on Gemini 2.5 Flash. Experimental results demonstrate that Auto-α improves retrieval accuracy for heterogeneous queries, reaching 38.83% Top-1 Recall over a 65,419-image gallery and outperforming nine fusion baselines evaluated under a unified configuration, with a controlled ablation attributing most of this gain to learning the weight rather than merely making it query-adaptive, while the LCM-LoRA module reduces computational costs by a factor of 12.5× in CPU environments, with a blinded radiologist evaluation confirming only a small drop in clinical quality. Furthermore, the clinical auditor achieves a 0.805 Pearson correlation against an expert radiologist, effectively correcting the systematic overestimation of traditional CLIP scores. Finally, the optimized platform is publicly deployed on Hugging Face.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.