Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42783857›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

A Hybrid Autoencoder YOLO Framework with Spatial Regularization for Rapid Small Maritime Object Detection.

M Mohidul Hossain Khan, Qiwei Hu, Radhakrishna Prabhu, Haiyong Zheng, Huagui Huang, Zonghua Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M Mohidul Hossain KhanSchool of Computing, Engineering and Technology, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen AB10 7QB, UK.
Qiwei HuNational Engineering Research Center for Equipment and Technology of Cold Strip Rolling, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China.
Radhakrishna PrabhuSchool of Computing, Engineering and Technology, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen AB10 7QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0642-8342
Haiyong ZhengCollege of Electronic Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8027-0734
Huagui HuangNational Engineering Research Center for Equipment and Technology of Cold Strip Rolling, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China.
Zonghua LiuSchool of Computing, Engineering and Technology, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen AB10 7QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2036-4640

Funding

School of Computing, Engineering and Technology PhD student scholarship at Robert Gordon University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maritime object detection is essential for port-based surveillance, ship tracking, and maritime security. However, practical implementation encounters two primary challenges: significant class imbalance (IMO identification numbers represent only 1.2% of labelled objects) and spatial inconsistency (predicted IMO numbers often appear beyond ship boundaries). Standard detectors and conventional class-balancing strategies fail to adequately address these difficulties, resulting in a persistent mismatch between research validation and practical performance. We present a hybrid autoencoder-YOLO framework with variable spatial regularisation. To the best of our understanding, this is the first methodology to simultaneously address class imbalance and spatial inconsistency in maritime IMO detection via reconstruction-guided learning and differentiable spatial regularisation. The model uses a YOLOv8 encoder shared by both a detection head (designed for ships and IMO numbers), and an auxiliary reconstruction decoder (a SkipDecoder with U-Net-style skip connections). A unique spatial limitation loss provides the physical restriction that each IMO number must be within a ship's bounding box, using only anticipated boxes. Training occurs in two phases: autoencoder pretraining on the marine dataset, followed by phased joint optimisation with a curriculum schedule for the spatial weighting. In a dataset of 297 annotated images (utilising five-fold cross-validation with a 47-image preserved test set), our comprehensive model achieved 50.1% IMO AP50-95, 97.8% IMO precision, and 94.6% IMO F1-score on the test set, beating the baseline YOLOv8s by +7.8 percentage points, +6.5 percentage points, and +5.2 percentage points, respectively. Ablation studies indicate that reconstruction instruction improves IMO AP50-95 by +4.5 percentage points, while spatial regularisation adds +3.3 percentage points. Although ship detection results in a small compromise (ship AP50-95 decreases from 77.0% to 55.6%), this appears to be practically acceptable given the essential role of IMO numbers as unique ship IDs. Significantly, inference speed improves by 20% (8.0 ms per image on an NVIDIA A100 GPU) relative to YOLOv8s (10.0 ms). Comparisons with leading detectors (RetinaNet, Faster R-CNN, DETR, EfficientDet), all initialised with standard COCO-pretrained backbones and fine-tuned on our dataset, reveal that none achieve an IMO AP50-95 exceeding 42.3%, highlighting the task's challenge and the accuracy of our design. The proposed framework shows potential to address the gap in practical implementation through reconstruction-based feature learning accompanied by a specified geometric baseline. It is precise, accurate, and fast, aligns with specific physics, and shows promise for real-time maritime surveillance applications, though we acknowledge the need for additional thorough verification across many operational environments.

Indexed as

deep learningIMO number identificationmarine securityreal-time object detectionship detectionspatial regularization

Identifiers

PMID42783857
PMCPMC13608120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.