Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42783855›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

Graph-Aware and Sequence-Aware Multimodal Deep Learning Framework for Cancer Detection and Risk Analysis from Medical Imaging.

Chetanpal Singh, Santoso Wibowo, Srimannarayana Grandhi, Satria Mandala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chetanpal SinghSchool of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Melbourne 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6246-444X
Santoso WibowoSchool of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Melbourne 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5318-8428
Srimannarayana GrandhiSchool of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Melbourne 3000, Australia.
Satria MandalaHuman Centric Engineering, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-6997-5875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early and accurate cancer detection from medical imaging remains challenging because clinically relevant evidence is distributed across local image appearance, structural relationships between suspicious regions, and ordered imaging context. This study proposes a graph-aware and sequence-aware deep learning framework that combines a convolutional neural network (CNN) backbone for spatial feature extraction, a Graph Attention Network (GAT) for lesion-structure modelling, and a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) module for ordered-view or slice-sequence representation learning. Cross-attention-based multimodal fusion is evaluated exclusively for the RSNA mammography task, where the metadata branch is restricted to patient age and implant status, both available before diagnosis. In contrast, the primary LIDC-IDRI experiment is conducted as an image-only analysis because radiologist malignancy scores and semantic nodule attributes are annotation-derived variables and are not treated as independent clinical predictors. The framework is evaluated on the RSNA Breast Cancer Detection dataset and the LIDC-IDRI lung CT dataset using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Additional ablation experiments assess the contribution of graph learning, sequence-aware modelling, and leakage-safe RSNA metadata fusion, while SHAP analysis quantifies the influence of the included RSNA metadata variables on multimodal predictions. For the RSNA multimodal experiment, the best held-out run achieved 95.2% accuracy and an AUC of 0.978, while three repeated runs yielded 94.0 ± 0.3% accuracy and an AUC of 0.970 ± 0.007 under the internal patient-wise benchmark protocol. These results should be interpreted as public-dataset benchmark outcomes rather than evidence of real-world clinical performance; external multi-centre and prospective validation is required before clinical deployment.

Indexed as

breast cancer classificationcomputer-aided diagnosiscross-attention fusiondeep learningexplainable artificial intelligencegraph attention networklung nodule classificationmedical image analysismultimodal learningsequence-aware learning

Identifiers

PMID42783855
PMCPMC13608555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.