ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Graph-Aware and Sequence-Aware Multimodal Deep Learning Framework for Cancer Detection and Risk Analysis from Medical Imaging.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and accurate cancer detection from medical imaging remains challenging because clinically relevant evidence is distributed across local image appearance, structural relationships between suspicious regions, and ordered imaging context. This study proposes a graph-aware and sequence-aware deep learning framework that combines a convolutional neural network (CNN) backbone for spatial feature extraction, a Graph Attention Network (GAT) for lesion-structure modelling, and a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) module for ordered-view or slice-sequence representation learning. Cross-attention-based multimodal fusion is evaluated exclusively for the RSNA mammography task, where the metadata branch is restricted to patient age and implant status, both available before diagnosis. In contrast, the primary LIDC-IDRI experiment is conducted as an image-only analysis because radiologist malignancy scores and semantic nodule attributes are annotation-derived variables and are not treated as independent clinical predictors. The framework is evaluated on the RSNA Breast Cancer Detection dataset and the LIDC-IDRI lung CT dataset using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Additional ablation experiments assess the contribution of graph learning, sequence-aware modelling, and leakage-safe RSNA metadata fusion, while SHAP analysis quantifies the influence of the included RSNA metadata variables on multimodal predictions. For the RSNA multimodal experiment, the best held-out run achieved 95.2% accuracy and an AUC of 0.978, while three repeated runs yielded 94.0 ± 0.3% accuracy and an AUC of 0.970 ± 0.007 under the internal patient-wise benchmark protocol. These results should be interpreted as public-dataset benchmark outcomes rather than evidence of real-world clinical performance; external multi-centre and prospective validation is required before clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.