ArticleJournal of imaging2026
End-to-End Trained Energy-Based Model for Image Recovery.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a novel end-to-end (E2E) empirical Bayes framework for learning the posterior distribution in linear inverse problems. The proposed framework models the log-posterior as the sum of a log-likelihood derived from the known forward model and a neural network-parameterized log-prior learned from training data. The approach enables both (a) computation of a point estimate i.e., stationary point of the learned log-posterior using a majorization minimization algorithm and (b) posterior sampling for computing the minimum mean square error (MMSE) estimate. Provided that the required surrogate function conditions are satisfied, the point estimation algorithm converges to a stationary point of the learned negative log-posterior without imposing contraction constraints. Unlike diffusion models that pre-learn the entire prior, learning the posterior directly leads to about 150× reduced training data requirements and 2× fewer parameters. Across three MRI acquisition settings, the framework improves point-estimation PSNR over PnP-ISTA by 3.07-4.37 dB while remaining competitive with existing E2E methods. Across two posterior sampling settings, it improves PSNR over DPS by 0.11-2.22 dB and over DAPS by 1.17-4.16 dB, while providing inference speedups of 2× and 5×, respectively. Furthermore, by avoiding algorithm unrolling, the proposed framework also reduces memory requirements by approximately 4× and 16× relative to E2E-MoL and E2E-EBM methods, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.