ReviewJournal of imaging2026
From Pixel Modification to Generative Synthesis: A Survey of Deep Learning for Image Data Hiding.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This survey presents a structured review of deep learning-based techniques for image data hiding, proposing a three-paradigm taxonomy organized by the method's operational relationship to the carrier image. We classify existing methods into modification-based, synthesis-based, and logic-based approaches. In the modification-based tier, we trace the architectural progression from foundational Convolutional Neural Networks and Generative Adversarial Networks to high-capacity Invertible Neural Networks and Transformers, analyzing their distinct trade-offs between embedding capacity, imperceptibility, and robustness. In the synthesis-based tier, we examine how Diffusion Probabilistic Models and generative adversarial frameworks reframe data hiding as a carrier generation problem rather than a pixel editing task. This paradigm encompasses both generative steganography (where carriers are synthesized from scratch) and proactive watermarking (where provenance is embedded during AI content generation). In the logic-based tier, we review zero-watermarking and coverless steganography, where ownership is established through feature extraction and semantic mapping without modifying any image, a critical property for sensitive domains such as medical imaging. Finally, we identify four persistent infrastructure gaps: benchmarking fragmentation, narrow robustness evaluation, domain generalization failures, and computational infeasibility that prevent real-world deployment despite architectural progress, and we propose concrete research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.