ArticleJournal of imaging2026
VentrEX: An Anatomically Guided Deep Learning Pipeline for Ventricular Segmentation in Cine Cardiac MRI.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated segmentation of the left and right ventricles (LVs and RVs) in cine cardiac MRI (CMR) underpins reliable volumetry and mass estimation. However, papillary muscles and trabeculae (PM/T) introduce clinically meaningful variability and exacerbate cross-dataset domain shift. We present VentrEX, an anatomically guided pipeline. The core segmenter, VentrEX-Seg, is a 3D encoder-decoder with parallel channel-spatial attention and a Transformer bottleneck. Training is performed exclusively on ACDC. A lightweight PM/T module automatically extracts papillary and trabecular burdens and standardizes cavity volumes. External evaluation is zero-shot (no fine-tuning) on Sunnybrook (LV) and MM-WHS MRI (RV). We report Dice, HD95 (mm); for volumetry, we use Bland-Altman analyses (LV and RV volumes). Attention/Grad-CAM visualizations support interpretability. On ACDC, VentrEX achieved higher Dice and lower boundary error than U-Net, nnU-Net, CBAM, and VentrEX-Seg. Zero-shot performance was preserved externally (e.g., Sunnybrook LV Dice 0.9053, HD95 4.95 mm; MM-WHS RV Dice 0.9236, HD95 6.61 mm). Patient-level Bland-Altman analyses characterized LV and RV volumetric agreement. Qualitative overlays and 3D reconstructions showed fewer PM/T "leaks" and anatomically plausible borders across ED/ES. Single-source training with dual zero-shot external tests demonstrates robustness under domain shift. The combination of parallel attention and a Transformer bottleneck enables accurate, transparent cine-CMR segmentation across datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.