ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Reproducible Semi-Automated Quantification of Vascularization in Bone Sections Using CD31 Immunohistochemistry and Trainable Weka Segmentation.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative assessment of vascularization is important in bone regeneration research, but CD31-immunohistochemically stained sections are often evaluated manually or semi-quantitatively, limiting reproducibility and comparability. The aim of this study was to establish and validate a reproducible, open-source workflow for semi-automated quantification of CD31-positive area fraction in bone sections using Fiji/ImageJ and Trainable Weka Segmentation (TWS). CD31-immunohistochemically stained rat bone sections from defect/regenerating tissue, femur, tibia, and spine were analyzed. The workflow combined standardized image acquisition, predefined regions of interest, pixel-based TWS classification, extraction of the CD31-positive class, and CD31-positive area normalized to tissue area (CD31.Ar/T.Ar). Manual reference measurements were performed by two independent observers in repeated runs. Manual CD31.Ar/T.Ar measurements showed good retest reliability, with mean coefficients of variation (CV) of 7.17% and 6.84% for observer 1 and observer 2, respectively, and good interobserver agreement. Independently trained TWS classifiers produced highly stable CD31.Ar/T.Ar values, with an overall mean CV of 1.98%. Manual assessment required 3:17 ± 1:35 min per section, whereas the TWS-based workflow separated an initial classifier training step from rapid repeated analysis of larger image sets. This study provides a transparent, reproducible, and time-efficient open-source workflow for semi-automated quantification of CD31-positive vascular area fraction in bone sections and supports its use as a scalable method for vascular histomorphometry in preclinical bone regeneration research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.