ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Area-Driven Adaptive Sampling of Closed Droplet Contours for Vision-Based Droplet Observation.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Closed droplet contours provide the geometric basis for area estimation in vision-based droplet observation. In OLED inkjet printing, droplets are deposited into pixel wells with predefined geometry; projected area is therefore a primary geometric quantity for assessing whether the deposited liquid sufficiently fills the well or risks overflow. This work formulates closed-contour sampling under a fixed sampling budget as an area-driven sampling problem. A leading-order analysis of the local arc-chord area error shows that the dominant cubic term depends jointly on curvature and segment length. Minimization of the resulting leading-order area-error functional yields an asymptotically optimal area-driven sampling density proportional to the cube root of curvature, together with a sampling-budget estimate under a target area-error tolerance. The derived sampling density is implemented on the fitted closed contour through cumulative-weight inversion. Experiments on random closed curves and the droplet dataset provide a systematic quantitative comparison with representative methods under identical fixed-budget settings, complemented by statistical analysis and evaluations of geometric fidelity, sensitivity, and computational efficiency. The proposed method achieves lower area estimation error under the tested sampling budgets, with the improvement being most pronounced at lower sampling budgets, while the reported geometric-fidelity metrics show no disproportionate degradation of contour fidelity. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of area-driven sampling for closed-contour area estimation under limited sampling budgets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.