ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2026
Biomechanical Evaluation of Patient-Specific Titanium Fixation Systems for Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy: A Finite Element Analysis.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-specific Ti-6Al-4V fixation systems are increasingly used to stabilise the maxilla following segmental Le Fort I osteotomy; however, the biomechanical responses of complete locking and non-locking patient-specific fixation configurations remain insufficiently characterised. In this study, two patient-specific plate designs (a standard design and a reduced, minimally invasive design) were analysed by linear-elastic finite element analysis, each with locking and non-locking screws. Because they were developed for different indications and evaluated in distinct patient-specific anatomical models, between-model comparisons were considered descriptive. Vertical forces of 97.6, 206.9, and 257.0 N were applied bilaterally to the incisor and premolar regions, and the equivalent von Mises stress and total displacement were evaluated in the bone, plates, and screws. All results scaled linearly with load. Within the standard model, the locking configuration exhibited slightly greater bone, plate, and screw displacement than the corresponding non-locking configuration. Within the reduced model, it exhibited lower maximum bone, plate, and screw displacement by 16.4%, 19.2%, and 16.3%, respectively. Solver-reported local stress maxima were concentrated at the screw-head/plate-hole transition; because these isolated peaks were contact- and mesh-sensitive, they were not used to quantify relative screw loading or predict yielding. The modelled locking and non-locking fixation configurations therefore exhibited different, model-dependent displacement patterns. Further controlled simulations and experimental validation are required to determine the clinical relevance of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.