ReviewJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2026
Static Stretching as a Multilevel Mechanobiological Process: An Integrative Narrative Review and Proposed Framework from Mechanical Loading to Biological Adaptation.
Review in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Static stretching is one of the most widely prescribed interventions in sports medicine, rehabilitation, and exercise science for improving joint range of motion (ROM) and flexibility. Despite decades of research, however, the biological mechanisms underlying its effects remain incompletely understood. Traditional explanations have primarily focused on muscle extensibility and passive tissue stiffness, whereas emerging evidence suggests that stretching may engage multiple mechanically and biologically interconnected systems. This integrative narrative review aimed to synthesize current evidence on the biological mechanisms underlying static stretching and to propose a conceptual, hypothesis-generating framework linking externally applied mechanical loading with biological responses across multiple levels of organization. Evidence from biomechanics, fascial biology, mechanotransduction, connective tissue biology, vascular physiology, and neuroscience was critically integrated, while distinguishing direct human static-stretching evidence from indirect human, preclinical, and general mechanobiological evidence. Although evidence supports contributions from several of these individual domains, direct human evidence demonstrating their integrated operation during static stretching remains limited. The available evidence therefore suggests that static stretching may be understood more broadly than as a muscle-centered flexibility intervention alone. Mechanical loading during stretching may be transmitted across muscular and connective tissues and interact with mechanosensitive cellular, extracellular-matrix, vascular, inflammatory, and neural processes; however, the directness and strength of evidence for these proposed links vary substantially. The resulting framework provides a plausible, testable hypothesis for how interactions among these processes may contribute to heterogeneous findings and inter-individual variability following stretching interventions, rather than an established explanatory model. Accordingly, this review conceptualizes static stretching as a biologically active mechanical stimulus whose effects may involve interacting responses across multiple levels of biological organization. By integrating evidence from previously separated biological domains while explicitly recognizing differences in evidence directness, the proposed framework provides a theoretical basis for future mechanistic research and for testing the causal and temporal relationships among these candidate processes in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.