Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42783606›Full record

ReviewJournal of xenobiotics2026

Current Evidence Linking Microplastic Exposure and Reproductive Cancers.

Barira Rais, Abul Vafa, Faten F Bin Dayel, Summya Rashid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of xenobiotics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Barira RaisSchool of Chemical & Life Sciences, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India.
Abul VafaSchool of Chemical & Life Sciences, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India.
Faten F Bin DayelDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdul Aziz University, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0006-8181-8374
Summya RashidDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdul Aziz University, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) have emerged as pervasive environmental contaminants with increasing evidence of human exposure and biological accumulation. Recent studies have confirmed their presence in multiple human reproductive tissues and fluids, including semen, testicular tissue, ovarian follicular fluid, cervicovaginal secretions, placenta, and breast milk, raising concerns regarding their potential implications for reproductive health. Beyond their widespread distribution, MPs have been shown in experimental studies to interact with cellular and molecular processes, including oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, mitochondrial dysfunction, and DNA damage, which are pathways commonly implicated in carcinogenesis. This review provides a comprehensive and critical synthesis of current evidence linking microplastic exposure to reproductive cancers, including prostate, testicular, ovarian, endometrial, cervical, and vaginal malignancies. Available mechanistic studies suggest that MPs may influence cancer-related biological processes through dysregulation of programmed cell death, genotoxicity, endocrine disruption, and modulation of signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT and MAPK. Experimental findings also indicate that MPs may alter the tumor microenvironment and affect cellular behaviors associated with proliferation, migration, and invasion. However, the majority of current evidence is derived from in vitro studies, animal models, and indirect mechanistic observations, while direct epidemiological evidence in humans remain limited. Furthermore, methodological heterogeneity in microplastic detection and characterization complicates comparisons across studies and hinders causal inference. Overall, current evidence supports the biological plausibility of an association between microplastic exposure and reproductive cancer-related processes, while highlighting the need for standardized methodologies and well-designed longitudinal human studies to clarify potential health risks.

Indexed as

carcinogenesisgenotoxicitymicroplasticsnanoplasticsoxidative stressreproductive cancers

Identifiers

PMID42783606
PMCPMC13608240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.