ArticleJournal of market access & health policy2026
The Post-Authorisation Maze: Mapping of European Pharmaceutical Market Access Pathways in the Early JCA Era.
Article in Journal of market access & health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 on health technology assessment (HTAR) harmonises clinical evidence assessment across Europe. However, national appraisal, pricing, and reimbursement processes remain divergent and could affect the efficiency of decision-making and patient access. Here we mapped the sequencing of national assessment, pricing, and reimbursement steps across 30 European countries. National pathways from marketing authorisation to reimbursed access were systematically identified and coded as categorical process sequences. Inpatient and outpatient pathways were analysed separately. Pathway dissimilarities were calculated using Optimal Matching and grouped by hierarchical clustering. We further explored whether clusters differed with regard to country-level indicators, including medicine availability, average time to access, gross domestic product, and healthcare expenditure. We found substantial procedural heterogeneity across countries in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Nevertheless, recurring pathway structures were identified. Across settings, the dominant distinction was between assessment-led pathways, in which evidence assessment precedes pricing and reimbursement steps, and pricing-led pathways, in which price formation occurs prior to assessment and reimbursement-related steps. Cluster membership was not associated with any country-level indicators. Our findings provide policymakers, agencies, and industry with a baseline for understanding national procedural heterogeneity and for evaluating how market access pathways evolve as the JCA is implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.